Accident Report 04 3586 - Class B Cargo Gear Failure, Spica, 15 October 2004

The reefer vessel Spica sustained a broken cargo runner whilst discharging vehicles at Freyberg Wharf on the Auckland waterfront on 15 October 2004

Details of Vessel, Owner, Classification, Manning & Crew:

Name of Vessel:

Spica

Vessel Type:

Palletised Reefer

Port of Registry:

Panama

IMO No.:

9016076

Built:

1991

Length Overall (m):

117.816

Maximum Breadth (m):

17.8

Gross Tonnage:

5 024

Net Tonnage:

2 893

Propulsion:

Kobe diesel 5295kW

Owner:

Rising Sun Line SA, Panama

Charterers:

Seatrade, Rotterdam

Trip Charterers:

Kiwi Car Carriers Ltd, Auckland

Classification Society:

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NKK)

Accident Investigator:

Ian Howden

 

• Classification Dates of Issuance/Expiry Certificates

Panama registration issued 17.10.2003. Valid to 04.12.2007.
Cargo Safety Equipment issued 30.09.2004. Valid to 27.02.2005.

• Cargo Gear Register

Last Annual Inspection

30.09.04 (Yokohama)

Last Quadrennial Inspection (Incl. Proof Load)

30.09.04 (Yokohama)

 

Gear tested to 6.25t. (SWL 5.0T, derricks, 2.5T Union Purchase)

Cargo runner wires certification:
(a) Certificate No. 00047164 (ex Haggie, Durban. S.S) 220m (BS) 21.888T. (SWL) 4.38T, 20mm diameter. Manufactured 26.05.00.

(b) Certificate No. 0204 Do (ex Busan, South Korea) supplied to vessel 23.04.02.

Wires in use on 15 October appear to have been curt from the 2002 wire coil.

• Outstanding Deficiencies/CAR’s (Corrective Action notices):

Spica’s last state inspection was on 21 November 2003 in Thailand. Nil deficiencies or corrective action notices were recorded. The vessel was not inspected in New Zealand

• Manning Details

Spica was under command of Captain I Yamada. The crew were Filipino nationals.

• Stevedoring Company

Toll Logistics trading as Leonard & Dingley

Narrative

At approximately 1140 hours New Zealand Daylight Time (NZDT) on 15 October 2004, vehicles were being discharged from the reefer vessel Spica at Freyberg Wharf. Two gangs from the stevedoring company were operating on board at the time. At about 1140 hours, a 0.5 tonne lifting frame was lifting an approximate 1.0 vehicle from No. 3 hold. The stevedore operating the winch observed the starboard runner wire was starting to unravel. The winch driver immediately lowered the port runner allowing the vehicle to drop onto the starboard deck, as the wire on the yardarm of the union purchase parted.

Vehicle on starboard deck after wire on the yardarm of the unioin purchase parted

Parted wire from the yardarm of the union purchase

Findings

Surveyors who inspected the accident site found:

(a) The broken wire appeared to have been previously damaged as broken strands were found a short distance from the break.

(b) The cargo runners that were shackled to the cargo hook monkey face were used to open and close the tween deck hatch covers.

(c) When opening the above covers the weight of the lift is taken on one runner only, placing more strain on that wire.

(d) The wires were observed to chafe on the hatch coaming.

(e) It was observed that the breakage occurred at a point where chafing had occurred.

(f) The remaining cargo runner wires appeared older and lacked sufficient lubrication.

(g) The open wire lay of the broken runner wire at No.3 hold was very dry and rusty.

Safety Recommendations

All cargo runner wires that are very dry and rusty be replaced.

All remaining cargo runner wires to be kept lubricated properly.

The above information to be recorded in the vessel’s Cargo Gear Register.

The above recommendations to be followed within two weeks of this report being finalised.